Schedule Rikers Island Visiting Hours

Privacy on the Internet: sentencing court for a dotted name and abbreviated online. The story

A ruling of the Supreme Court on an episode of invasion of privacy.

Erano state inserite in una pagina web le iniziali di una persona insieme al suo numero di cellulare.

Un uomo di 32 anni, di Roma, è stato condannato a sei mesi di reclusione e a un risarcimento di oltre 6 mila euro per violazione della privacy su Internet.

La sentenza è stata emessa dalla Terza sezione penale della Cassazione.

L’uomo, nel gennaio 2001, aveva aperto una casella di posta elettronica con una dicitura di fantasia per sbeffeggiare L.M., una ragazza che aveva cambiato atteggiamento nei suoi confronti. A.M., queste le iniziali del colpevole, aveva inserito nella casella di posta elettronica il nome puntato della ragazza e il suo numero di cellulare.

The woman had started receiving numerous phone calls from unknown that bothered.

The ruling of the Supreme Court came after the pronouncement of the Court of Rome, in November 2005 had sentenced the man to the crime punished by law for the protection of privacy and harassment, imposing the defendant eight months' imprisonment, suspended with probation, and a compensation of 10 000 €.

The Rome Court had emphasized that the users of the web, after reading the offers contained in the e-mail, contacted the girl on the user bad phone and harassment.

The man had approached the Court of Appeal, which last May had reduced the sentence to six months in prison and € 6,000 compensation.

The defense lawyer had appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court, arguing that the young man had placed on the Web one page graphic that contains the mobile number of LM, but not his personal data, since the number of mobile phone users was free from personal references.

The defense added that had been placed only the name of the girl pointed to, without name, and had opened a mailbox with the address of fantasy.

But the Supreme Court declared the application inadmissible, referring to the legislative decree 467 of 2001 in updating the Privacy Act, which defines personal data as "any information concerning a natural person, legal person, entity or association, identified or identifiable, even indirectly, by reference to any other information, including a personal identification number. "

The man, in the ground that the appeal, was also ordered to pay a thousand euro to the case of fines and court costs incurred by the victim to the Supreme Court for an amount of € 2,230.

Fireman Sam Wallpaper Border

Delete names of people from Web sites to ensure privacy. Proposed by Supervisor

Ombudsman for Data Protection has identified certain procedures techniques that publishers have to do to respect the privacy of people mentioned in articles.

Ombudsman for Data Protection has identified a few technical details that publishers have to do to prevent search engines automatically appear in the personal data contained in the archives of newspapers. Even those outdated or incomplete. Objective: To protect the privacy of individuals.

The Authority has done so following a number of complaints against a publisher who has made available to the search engine part of the historical archive of his newspaper.

who filed an appeal complaining the fact that, by typing its name on a common search engine, get news published many years earlier.

One of the complainants, in particular, involved in a lawsuit and later acquitted, said the research results did not reflect the positive outcome of legal proceedings. In other cases, some people who had changed occupation were still associated with the previous positions.

The applicants had requested the cancellation or modification of data.

The Authority has not accepted the request of interested parties, but considered their legitimate request to see their current protected condition.

And so he decided to impose the publisher of the ad hoc technical criteria, such as, for example, preparing a version of the article that does not show the personal data of applicants if the piece can be removed automatically search engines outside the site, or a system that can guarantee that the news can be traced only by using the search engine inside the newspaper or website.

Cervical Spondylosis With Dizziness

Update the antivirus is a must, otherwise you risk denunciation and condemnation by the court, come per il Comune di Milano

In the past the City of Milan was dogged by a virus, whatever the result of receiving a fine, by the Guarantor in respect of personal data, by omission of safety measures and the obligation to provide regularization of the virus within a short time.

Today seems to be opening the case, a PM rather attentive to the matter has notified a notice of the Head of the IT systems of the time, challenging two offenses: failure to control the security measures of information systems, the ' another consisting of false statements made to the Guarantor in relation to adaptation measures after the period prescribed by the Authority for the same compliance.

What crimes are we talking about? We are talking about two crimes proceedings office in the Legislative Decree 196/2003 (the so-called Code on Personal Data Protection), which provide quite a few consequences negative finding of liability in the case of those under investigation.

The offense based on the security measures is cited art. 169 of that Code, which expressly provides that:

• Anyone, there being required, fails to take the minimum measures laid down in Article 33 shall be punished by imprisonment up to two years or a fine of ten thousand to € fifty thousand euro;

• the offender, when the assessment or, in complex cases, with subsequent act of the Guarantor, shall be given a prescription for a fixed time for the adjustment period of time not exceeding the technically necessary prorogabile in caso di particolare complessità o per l'oggettiva difficoltà dell'adempimento e comunque non superiore a sei mesi. Nei sessanta giorni successivi allo scadere del termine, se risulta l'adempimento alla prescrizione, l'autore del reato è ammesso dal Garante a pagare una somma pari al quarto del massimo dell'ammenda stabilita per la contravvenzione. L'adempimento e il pagamento estinguono il reato.

Ebbene, all'epoca del primo controllo fu impartito al Comune il termine di prescrizione per l'adeguamento, difatti il Responsabile dei sistemi informativi rilasciò poi successivamente al Garante la dichiarazione inerente l'adeguamento avvenuto, evento che evidentemente avrebbe generato la presunta violazione lamentata dal PM ovvero la resa di false attestazioni all'Autorità Garante.

Il problema è sorto quando a fine anno passato, proprio l'Autorità ha promosso una verifica presso il Comune, considerata la precedente gravità dei fatti: dall'accertamento è emersa la presenza di antivirus su 7000 e passa client, rispetto ai 10.500 client presenti realmente presso gli uffici del Comune.

È ovvio che ad oggi sotto il profilo penale si sta esclusivamente parlando di una potenziale responsabilità, è pur vero che gli aspetti relativi alla responsabilità penale nell'ambito privacy, vengono fin troppo sottovalutati.

Spesso titolari e responsabili dei trattamenti sono scettici circa i controlli e la concretezza delle responsabilità derivanti in materia di privacy, ritenendo con troppa leggerezza che le misure di sicurezza non a norma oggi, verranno "sistemate" nel tempo.

Il tempo è già arrivato, il Codice in materia di protezione dati personali è in vigore dal primo gennaio 2004, le misure di sicurezza, anche se non fossero imposte dal legislatore, dovrebbero essere applicate solo alla luce dell'importanza che i dati rivestono all'interno del settore pubblico o privato: antivirus, password, back-up non dovrebbero trovare imposizione nel Codice privacy, dovrebbero essere una premura dei titolari del trattamento, adottando semplicemente una diligenza media.

And especially in case of outsourcing the management of security measures would be appropriate checks and get feedback about the accuracy of the measures taken.

Today this in many public and private facilities still not done, but there's no excuse ...